New Disease Reports (2012) 25, 2. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2012.025.002]
Get pdf (454 KB)

First report of Colletotrichum capsici causing anthracnose on grapes in Maharashtra, India

I.S. Sawant*, S.P. Narkar, D.S. Shetty, A. Upadhyay and S.D. Sawant

*indulika18@yahoo.co.in

Show affiliations

Received: 25 Mar 2011; Published: 27 Jan 2012

Keywords: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Vitis vinifera

Anthracnose is an economically important disease of table grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) in the warm and wet tropical and sub-tropical areas of India. Although worldwide anthracnose is reported to be caused by Elsinoe ampelina (de Bary) Shear (anamorph Sphaceloma ampelinum de Bary) (Mirica, 1998), in India Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. acutatum have also been reported as causal pathogens (Kumar et. al., 1994; Chowdappa et. al., 2009). However, in 370 isolations from anthracnose samples collected from commercial vineyards during 2009, Colletotrichum capsici was isolated with a frequency of 3.8%. It was isolated from small dark brown spots on the leaves and petioles of cv. Thompson Seedless (Tas-A-Ganesh and 2A clones) and from cv. Chardonnay (Fig. 1) in mixed infection with C. gloeosporioides.

The fungus was identified based on morphological characters. The isolates were slow growing with a growth rate of 3.86 ± 0.29 mm/day on Czapek Dox Agar at 30 ± 0.1°C. The colonies were brownish white and later turned dark grey or moss green in colour. The acervuli were either scattered or in concentric rings. It produced falcate conidia of size 21.7 x 5.1 µm. All of 14 isolates from grape produced setae in their acervuli (Fig. 2).

To confirm the identity, PCR was performed using a C. capsici species-specific primer pair, CcINT (TCTCCCCGTCCGCGGGTGG) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) (Sheu & Wang, 2005). The total genomic DNA was extracted from five-day-old fungal mycelium according to the protocol of Lee & Taylor (1990) and PCR was performed according to Chowdappa et al. (2009). The expected single specific fragment of approximately 460 base pairs was amplified from all the tested C. capsici isolates, confirming their identity (Fig. 3). This primer pair did not amplify DNA from isolates belonging to C. gloeosporioides. The pathogenicity of C. capsici was confirmed by artificial inoculation using a spore suspension (1x10 conidia/ml) sprayed on young growing shoots of Thompson Seedless plants raised in pots. The pots were maintained in a humid chamber (RH > 90 %) at 28 ± 1 °C. Symptoms were observed after seven days (Fig. 4). C. capsici was re-isolated from these lesions fulfilling Koch's postulates. No symptoms were produced in leaves of plants sprayed with sterile distilled water. Although C. capsici is reported on many hosts from India and other countries of the world (Farr & Rossman, 2010), to our knowledge, this is the first report of Colletotrichum capsici affecting grapes.

Figure1+
Figure 1: Figure 1: Field symptoms produced by Colletotrichum capsici on Tas-A-Ganesh grape leaves (note small lesions indicated by arrow; bigger lesions are caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides).
Figure 1: Figure 1: Field symptoms produced by Colletotrichum capsici on Tas-A-Ganesh grape leaves (note small lesions indicated by arrow; bigger lesions are caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides).
Figure2+
Figure 2: Figure 2: Acervuli of Colletotrichim capsici with spores and setae.
Figure 2: Figure 2: Acervuli of Colletotrichim capsici with spores and setae.
Figure3+
Figure 3: Figure 3: Gel showing comparison of Colletotrichum capsici isolates (lanes 1-5) with Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates (lanes 6-7) and the non-template control (NT). M indicates the 100bp ladder.
Figure 3: Figure 3: Gel showing comparison of Colletotrichum capsici isolates (lanes 1-5) with Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates (lanes 6-7) and the non-template control (NT). M indicates the 100bp ladder.
Figure4+
Figure 4: Figure 4: Symptoms produced on cv. Thompson Seedless grape leaves following artificial inoculation with Colletotrichum capsici.
Figure 4: Figure 4: Symptoms produced on cv. Thompson Seedless grape leaves following artificial inoculation with Colletotrichum capsici.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) for part financial support under the Outreach Program on "Diagnosis and Management of Leaf Spot Diseases of Field and Horticultural Crops".


References

  1. Chowdappa P, Reddy GS, Kumar A, Rao BM, Rawal RD, 2009. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Colletotrichum spp. causing anthracnose disease of grapes. The Asian and Australian Journal of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology 3, 71-77.
  2. Farr DF, Rossman AY, 2011. Fungal Databases. Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/.
  3. Kumar S, Thind TS, Mohan C, 1994. Occurrence of Gloeosporium ampelophagum and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the incitants of grape anthracnose, during different months in Punjab. Plant Disease Research 9, 222-224.
  4. Lee SB, Taylor JW, 1990. Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single spores. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. London, UK: Academic Press, 282-287.
  5. Mirica, II, 1998. Anthracnose.In: Pearson RC, Goheen AC, eds. Compendium of Grape Diseases. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society, 18-19.
  6. Sheu Z, Wang T, 2005. Evaluation of phenotypic and molecular criteria for the identification of Colletotrichum species causing pepper anthracnose in Taiwan. In: Proceedings of the Second Asian Conference on Plant Pathology, Singapore, 25-28 June 2005. Singapore: Plant Protection Society, 26-27 (Abstract).

To cite this report: Sawant IS, Narkar SP, Shetty DS, Upadhyay A, Sawant SD, 2012. First report of Colletotrichum capsici causing anthracnose on grapes in Maharashtra, India. New Disease Reports 25, 2. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2012.025.002]

©2012 The Authors