New Disease Reports (2012) 26, 21. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2012.026.021]
Get pdf (505 KB)

First report of a 'Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris' (16SrI group) associated with little leaf disease of Solanum melongena (brinjal) in India

J. Kumar 1*, S. Gunapati 2, S.P. Singh 1, A. Lalit 3, N.C. Sharma 3 and R. Tuli 1

*jitsingh27281@gmail.com

Show affiliations

Received: 07 Feb 2012; Published: 16 Nov 2012

Keywords: BLL phytoplasma, 16S ribosomal DNA, RFLP

During November 2007, brinjal little leaf (BLL) symptoms (Fig. 1) were observed in approximately 20% of the brinjal (Solanum melongena) plants growing in the fields of Bihar, India, leading to the suspicion of a phytoplasma infection.  To test for the presence of phytoplasma, genomic DNA was isolated from the leaf midribs of ten plants with and four plants without symptoms, and the phytoplasma DNA amplified by nested PCR with the universal primers P1/P7 (Deng & Hiruki, 1991) followed by R16mF2/R16mR1 (Gundersen & Lee, 1996), as previously described (Khan et al., 2004). The nested PCR amplicons of 1.4 kb corresponding to the phytoplasma 16S ribosomal DNA were cloned into pDRIVE vector (Qiagen GmbH, Germany). No PCR amplicons were observed for the symptomless plants. Twelve positive clones containing 16S ribosomal DNA of phytoplasma were sequenced and found sharing a 99.93% of sequence identity. Sequences of two clones were deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. JQ518317 and JQ518318). In silico RFLP patterns were generated from the phytoplasma 16S ribosomal sequences using the gel plotting program pDRAW32 (http://www.acaclone.com/) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method of MEGA 4 (Tamura et al., 2007).

BLAST analysis revealed that the Bihar phytoplasma detected in brinjal showed 98% 16S rDNA sequence identity with those of phytoplasmas from group 16SrI ('Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris'). The Bihar phytoplasma also showed only 84%, 74% and 72% 16S rDNA sequence identity respectively with those of the previously reported BLL phytoplasmas in India (EF186820, EU375486) and Bangladesh (AF228052) belonging to the 16SrVI group (‘Ca. Phytoplasma trifolii’). Phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2) evidenced that the phytoplasma associated with little leaf in brinjal in Bihar separated as a new phylogenetic branch within the 16SrI group cluster. In silico restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns were generated (Wei et al., 2007) for the Bihar BLL phytoplasma and the 16SrVI BLL phytoplasma reported earlier in India (EF186820) as well as the 16SrI Indian phytoplasmas identified in sandal spike (EF198362) and withania (DQ151998) (Fig. 3) with 13 restriction enzymes (AluI, BamHI, BfaI, DraI, EcoRI, HaeIII, HhaI, HinfI, HpaI, HpaII, KpnI, I, and TaqI).  All the RFLP profiles of the Bihar BLL phytoplasma were similar to those of the 16SrI phytoplasmas, except for the AluI and KpnI RFLP patterns that differed from those exhibited by the 16SrVI BLL phytoplasma (EF186820). RFLP and the sequence results confirmed that the Bihar BLL phytoplasma is closely related to the phytoplasma group 16SrI and may represent a new subgroup within this group. This is the first report of a 16SrI phytoplasma affecting brinjal in India. The fact that two different phytoplasma groups (16SrVI and 16SrI) have been associated with little leaf diseases in brinjal may have further significant impact on disease epidemiology and control in India.

Figure1+
Figure 1: Little leaf-like symptoms of infected Solanum melongena plants in Bihar, India.
Figure 1: Little leaf-like symptoms of infected Solanum melongena plants in Bihar, India.
Figure2+
Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Bihar BLL phytoplasmas (JQ518317 and JQ518318) and other reference phytoplasmas. ‘Ca. P.’ stands for 'Candidatus' Phytoplasma species’.
Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of Bihar BLL phytoplasmas (JQ518317 and JQ518318) and other reference phytoplasmas. ‘Ca. P.’ stands for 'Candidatus' Phytoplasma species’.
Figure3+
Figure 3: Virtual RFLP patterns from in silico digestions of the 16S rDNA sequences of the Bihar BLL phytoplasma (JQ518317) and other BLL phytoplasma strains from groups 16SrI (EF198362, DQ151998) and 16SrVI (EF186820). MW=NEB (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) 100 bp ladder.
Figure 3: Virtual RFLP patterns from in silico digestions of the 16S rDNA sequences of the Bihar BLL phytoplasma (JQ518317) and other BLL phytoplasma strains from groups 16SrI (EF198362, DQ151998) and 16SrVI (EF186820). MW=NEB (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) 100 bp ladder.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for funding.


References

  1. Deng S, Hiruki C, 1991. Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from culturable and non-culturable mollicutes. Journal of Microbiological Methods 14, 53–61. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(91)90007-D]
  2. Gundersen DE, Lee IM, 1996. Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer sets. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 35, 144-151.
  3. Khan JA, Srivastava P, Singh SK, 2004. Efficacy of nested-PCR for the detection of phytoplasma causing spike disease of sandal. Current Science 86, 1530-1533. [http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/jun102004/1530.pdf]
  4. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S, 2007. MEGA 4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 1596-1599. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm092]
  5. Wei W, Davis RE, Lee IM, Zhao Y, 2007. Computer-simulated RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA genes: identification of ten new phytoplasma groups. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 57, 1855–1867. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65000-0]

To cite this report: Kumar J, Gunapati S, Singh SP, Lalit A, Sharma NC, Tuli R, 2012. First report of a 'Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris' (16SrI group) associated with little leaf disease of Solanum melongena (brinjal) in India. New Disease Reports 26, 21. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2012.026.021]

©2012 The Authors