New Disease Reports (2013) 27, 12. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2013.027.012]
Get pdf (842 KB)

First report of Thielaviopsis paradoxa causing palm fruit rot of Butia capitata in Uruguay

V. Gepp*, L. Hernández, S. Alaniz and F. Zaccari

*vgepp@fagro.edu.uy

Show affiliations

Received: 28 Jan 2013; Published: 02 Apr 2013

Keywords: Ceratocystis paradoxa, fungal plant disease

Butia capitata palms are endemic to southern Brazil and eastern Uruguay, but the original palm forests that covered extensive areas are disappearing due to lack of regeneration in areas used for cattle, rice or other agricultural purposes (Rivas & Barilani, 2004). The fruit is consumed fresh or processed by the local inhabitants to supplement their incomes, providing vitamin C and carotenoids and having antioxidant properties (Crosa et al., 2011). Research is being carried out in an effort to conserve this natural resource by increasing its commercial utility. In April 2011 ripe fruit was harvested near Castillos in southeastern Uruguay and stored at different temperatures. After seven days at 20ºC and 90% relative humidity, 24% had rotted with 80% rotten after 21 days (Zaccari et al., 2012). The fruit lost their yellow-orange colour, becoming brown, and then black and shrivelled due to loss of moisture (Fig. 1). At high relative humidity they were covered by white mycelium that became black with age (Fig. 2).

Pieces of rotten tissue were plated out on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and a fungus, which rapidly became black, was isolated. It produced individual elongated conidiophores which extrude chains of short cylindrical conidia through the open end: colourless, dimensions 3.1 x 8 μm at first, later golden brown, 10.5 x 18 μm; together with chains of dark brown, thick walled chlamydospores (9 x 12.4 μm) also forming in terminal chains (Fig. 3). These features are characteristic of the Thielaviopsis paradoxa anamorph of Ceratocystis paradoxa (Morgan-Jones, 1967; Ellis, 1971). This identification was confirmed by sequencing the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) region of rDNA of a representative isolate (BUTIA-1) with ITS1/ITS4 primers (White et al., 1990). The sequence was compared with those deposited in GenBank. The isolate BUTIA-1 (Accession No. JX629245) had 100% of homology with Ceratocystis paradoxa (JQ387728).

Three banana fruit and six B. capitata fruit were wounded and inoculated with mycelial plugs from the Ceratocystis paradoxa isolate BUTIA-1 grown on PDA and incubated at 25ºC and 100% relative humidity. Wounding was accomplished by inserting a sterile scalpel (5 mm) into the fruit. As a control three banana fruit and six B. capitata fruit, were wounded and incubated in the same way. A black rot developed on both hosts, on banana after 10 days and on palm fruits in only five days (Fig. 4) and the pathogen was re-isolated from them confirming Koch´s postulates. Control fruit remained symptomless. This is the first report of Ceratocystis paradoxa in Uruguay and, to our knowledge, the first identification of this pathogen causing disease on Butia sp. palms.

Figure1+
Figure 1: Black rot of Butia capitata fruit after storage.
Figure 1: Black rot of Butia capitata fruit after storage.
Figure2+
Figure 2: Mycelium on rotted Butia capitata fruit after storage.
Figure 2: Mycelium on rotted Butia capitata fruit after storage.
Figure3+
Figure 3: Conidia and chlamydospores of Thielaviopsis paradoxa.
Figure 3: Conidia and chlamydospores of Thielaviopsis paradoxa.
Figure4+
Figure 4: Wound inoculated Butia capitata fruit showing black rot five days after inoculation (left) and uninoculated control (right).
Figure 4: Wound inoculated Butia capitata fruit showing black rot five days after inoculation (left) and uninoculated control (right).

References

  1. Crosa MJ, Burzaco P, Pastorino N, Irisity M, Gioscia D, Ayres C, 2011. Caracterización fisicoquímica y nutricional del fruto Butia capitata y de su pulpa tamizada. INNOTEC - Revistas del Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay, No. 6, 3-6.
  2. Ellis MB, 1971. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Kew: Surrey, Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
  3. Morgan-Jones G, 1967. Ceratocystis paradoxa. Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria. No. 143. Kew Surry, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
  4. Rivas M, Barilani A, 2004. Diversidad, potencial productivo y reproductivo de los Palmares de Butia capitata (MART) BECC. de Uruguay. Agrociencia 8, 11-20.
  5. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW, 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetic. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR Protocols. A Guide to Methods and Applications. San Diego, CA, USA: Academics Press, 315-322.
  6. Zaccari Viega FI, Crosa MJ, Irisity M, 2012. Evolución de la calidad de frutos de butiá (Butia capitata, Mart. Becc.) en almacenamiento refrigerado. INNOTEC - Revistas del Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay, No. 7, 37-43.

To cite this report: Gepp V, Hernández L, Alaniz S, Zaccari F, 2013. First report of Thielaviopsis paradoxa causing palm fruit rot of Butia capitata in Uruguay. New Disease Reports 27, 12. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2013.027.012]

©2013 The Authors