New Disease Reports (2018) 37, 13. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2018.037.013]
Get pdf (714 KB)

First report of Diaphorthe masirevicii causing leaf blight of Gloriosa superba in India

J. Naveen 1, H.M. Navya 1, G. Hithamani 2, S.R. Niranjana 1 and P. Hariprasad 3*

*phari@iitd.ac.in

Show affiliations

Received: 29 Sep 2017; Published: 02 Mar 2018

Gloriosa superba (Glory lily, Colchicaceae) is an endangered perennial climbing herb, grown in Africa and Asia for its medicinal properties (Jain & Suryavanshi, 2010). A leaf blight disease (Fig. 1) was observed during surveys performed in the region of Mysore, India. The first symptoms of infection were small (2-5 mm diameter), circular to oval, light brownish spots, surrounded by a yellow halo. Leaf spots occured on the leaf tips, margins and midribs of the leaves, enlarging to form spots with concentric rings. Embedded in the necrotic tissues were black fruiting bodies of a fungus. These symptoms also appeared later on the stem. 

Infected leaves were surface sterilised with 70% ethanol followed by three washes with sterile distilled water and incubated for seven days on moist blotter discs. After incubation, colony development was examined and the fungus isolated and maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The fungus was identified based on its colony type, morphology and production of pycnidial ooze (Fig. 2). Pycnidiospores were produced in slimy masses and were of two types, alpha and beta. Alpha conidia were fusoid to ellipsoidal and biguttulate, while beta conidia were filiform, slightly curved and rarely straight (Fig. 3). The morphological characters of the fungus were compared with the description of Thompson et al. (2015) and identified as Diaphorthe sp. Fungal DNA was extracted from mycelium following standard procedures (Saitho et al., 2006). The fungus was identified by amplifying and sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), β-tubulin and transition elongation factor (TEF) regions using specific primers (Table 1). BLAST analysis revealed identities of 99% for ITS, 99% for β-tubulin and 100% for TEF to D. masirevicii isolate 054 (GenBank Accession No. KR024727), D. masirevicii isolate BRIP 57892a (KJ197257) and D. masirevicii isolate BRIP 54120a (KJ197243), respectively. These sequences were submitted to GenBank (ITS: MF682435, β-tubulin: MF668289 and TEF: MF668290).

Pathogenicity tests were conducted using a detached leaf assay (n=25) and whole plant assay (n=10), under greenhouse conditions (22-28°C and under natural light). A suspension of alpha conidia was prepared by flooding 18 to 21-day-old PDA cultures with sterile distilled water and adjusting the spore concentration to 1 × 106 conidia/ml. Detached healthy and surface-sterilised leaves were wounded by pricking with a sterile needle, and 10 μl of conidial suspension placed onto the wound site. Wounded control leaves received only distilled water. The leaves were incubated in a moist chamber at 28 ±2°C for three-seven days. The appearance of water-soaked lesions and brown spots on inoculated leaves confirmed pathogenicity (Fig. 4). The whole plant assay was conducted using three-month-old plants. Plants were spray inoculated with either a suspension of 1 × 106 conidia/ml, or water as a control and observed for symptoms for the next thirty days. The pathogen was reisolated from infected leaves showing typical symptoms, thus fulfilling Koch postulates. 

As per our knowledge and from a literature survey, this is the first report of Diaphorthe masirevicii causing leaf blight of Gloriosa superba in India.

Figure1+
Figure 1: Leaf and stem symptoms on Gloriosa superba in the field.
Figure 1: Leaf and stem symptoms on Gloriosa superba in the field.
Figure2+
Figure 2: Pycnidia of Diaphorthe masirevicii with pycnidiospore mass.
Figure 2: Pycnidia of Diaphorthe masirevicii with pycnidiospore mass.
Figure3+
Figure 3: Alpha (i) and beta (ii) conidia of Diaphorthe masirevicii.
Figure 3: Alpha (i) and beta (ii) conidia of Diaphorthe masirevicii.
Figure4+
Figure 4: Lesions and brown spots on inoculated leaves (right) compared to a control leaf (left) in a detached leaf assay. 
Figure 4: Lesions and brown spots on inoculated leaves (right) compared to a control leaf (left) in a detached leaf assay. 
Figure5+

References

  1. Jain AP, Suryavanshi S, 2010. Gloriosa superba Linn. - A pharmacological review. International Journal of Pharma Research and Development 2, 24-26.
  2. Saitoh K-I, Togashi K, Arie T, Teraoka T, 2006. A simple method for a mini-preparation of fungal DNA. Journal of General Plant Pathology 72, 348-350. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10327-006-0300-1]
  3. Thompson SM, Tan YP, Shivas RG, Neate SM, Morin L, Bissett A, Aitken EAB, 2015. Green and brown bridges between weeds and crops reveal novel Diaporthe species in Australia. Persoonia: Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 35, 39-49. [http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158515X687506]

To cite this report: Naveen J, Navya HM, Hithamani G, Niranjana SR, Hariprasad P, 2018. First report of Diaphorthe masirevicii causing leaf blight of Gloriosa superba in India. New Disease Reports 37, 13. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2018.037.013]

©2018 The Authors